<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Topics tagged with value select]]></title><description><![CDATA[A list of topics that have been tagged with value select]]></description><link>https://community.troikatronix.com/tags/value select</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2026 18:42:42 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://community.troikatronix.com/tags/value select.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2020 08:45:29 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[[ANSWERED] Selector &#x2F; Value Select actors]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="https://community.troikatronix.com/uid/43">@jfg</a> said:</p>
<blockquote>problem</blockquote>
<p> I don’t have a problem with the clarity of ‘mutable’. Perhaps the confusion comes from the word ‘mute’ that can mean a ‘reduction of strength or intensity’. So it is a misunderstanding to associate the term ‘mutable‘ with the word ‘mute’. in this case ‘mutable’ does not mean ‘able to be muted’.</p>
<p>I would suggest to continue referring to the ports as mutable, even if there is a misplaced ambiguity.</p>]]></description><link>https://community.troikatronix.com/topic/6759/answered-selector-value-select-actors</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.troikatronix.com/topic/6759/answered-selector-value-select-actors</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[bonemap]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2020 08:45:29 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>