<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Did someone try the Blackmagic UltraStudio 4K ?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<div style="font-weight:normal">Hello all,</div>
<div><span style="font-weight:normal">I would like to know if someone has tried the </span>**Blackmagic UltraStudio 4K** ?</div>
<div>The main advantage compared with the **UltraStudio Express** is an update which seems to allow a separated capture and playback :</div>
<div style="font-weight:normal"><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"></span>" The new version promised full duplex mode (simultaneous capture and playback) and decreased I/O latency "</div>
<div style="font-weight:normal">Does it mean that it is possible to use at the same time one input and one output ?</div>
<div style="font-weight:normal">For the others external cards, the output seems to be the mirror of the input if an camera is plugged for example.</div>
<div style="font-weight:normal">So if this is right, it leaves free one thunderbolt port in case of capture and playback...</div>
<div style="font-weight:normal">Another thing, I could make just a quick test on a Mac Pro with an internal Blackmagic card :</div>
<div style="font-weight:normal">are the settings only in Output &gt; External Video Out Device (not in the Stage Preferences) ?</div>
<div style="font-weight:normal">And how does the blackmagic card appears in Live Capture settings ?</div>
<div style="font-weight:normal">Thank you for your advice.</div>
<div style="font-weight:normal">All the best.</div>
<div style="font-weight:normal">Clement</div>]]></description><link>https://community.troikatronix.com/topic/1537/did-someone-try-the-blackmagic-ultrastudio-4k</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2026 00:10:25 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://community.troikatronix.com/topic/1537.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2014 05:30:15 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Did someone try the Blackmagic UltraStudio 4K ? on Wed, 15 Oct 2014 09:43:58 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="https://community.troikatronix.com/uid/8">@Fred</a> Thanks a lot for your answer, it's more clear to me now !</p>
<div>I will have a look on BM UltraStudio Express then, instead of Intensity family because SDI connectors can be useful thereafter.</div>
<div>Thanks again. Best.</div>
<div>Clement</div>]]></description><link>https://community.troikatronix.com/post/13163</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.troikatronix.com/post/13163</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Clement]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2014 09:43:58 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Did someone try the Blackmagic UltraStudio 4K ? on Tue, 14 Oct 2014 22:30:20 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">@<a href="http://troikatronix.com/troikatronixforum/profile/729/Clement" rel="nofollow ugc">Clement</a><span style="color:rgb(119, 119, 119);font-family:Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif;font-size:10px;line-height:18px;background-color:rgb(255, 255, 255)">  </span>The blackmagic output has no open GL, it is not a video card. Anything you want to send has to be rendered by the video card, converted to bitmap and then sent to the output. The blackmagic API does this in a quite efficient way but it is in no way a substitute for a video card. What it does ensure it broadcast framesync and colour space.</p>
<div>I have not used the 4k but it uses the same drivers as the rest of the capture family and should work fine as the other capture cards work, (within the limitation that Isadora still uses the ageing quicktime library for capture). </div>
<div>Yes if you want HDSDI out use an HMDI to to SDI convertor from the HDMI output.</div>
<div><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="https://community.troikatronix.com/uid/5">@keftaparty</a> was right (as usual)</div>]]></description><link>https://community.troikatronix.com/post/13145</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.troikatronix.com/post/13145</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Fred]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2014 22:30:20 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Did someone try the Blackmagic UltraStudio 4K ? on Mon, 13 Oct 2014 10:32:57 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="https://community.troikatronix.com/uid/5">@keftaparty</a></p>
<div>Thank you Mehdi for your advice.</div>
<div>I am looking on this BM UltraStudio 4K card because it seems to be multipurpose, especially if simultaneous input and output is enable (and maybe less latency). I may have to buy a capture card for a future project, and it can be a good thing to get this one which works with SD and HD (not for its 4K specification).</div>
<div>I didn't know that BM cards have hardware limitations for output.</div>
<div>I have a MBR retina with HDMI output : with this thunderbolt card (or the UltraStudio Express), if I want to connect a projector in HD-SDI for example, do you think it's better to use the computer HDMI port + HDMI / HD-SDI converter, instead of the Blackmagic HD-SDI output ?</div>
<div>For the price (<span style="font-family:Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif;font-size:12px;line-height:16.799999237060547px;background-color:rgb(255, 255, 255)">~850€) the </span><span style="font-size:10pt">BM UltraStudio 4K is maybe a better choice than BM </span><span style="font-size:10pt">UltraStudio Express </span><span style="font-size:10pt">(</span><span style="font-family:Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif;font-size:12px;line-height:16.799999237060547px;background-color:rgb(255, 255, 255)">~400€) + converter </span><span style="font-size:10pt">(</span><span style="font-family:Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif;font-size:12px;line-height:16.799999237060547px;background-color:rgb(255, 255, 255)">~250€) considering its possible uses, but maybe I'm wrong.</span></div>
<div><span style="font-family:Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif;font-size:12px;line-height:16.799999237060547px;background-color:rgb(255, 255, 255)">  
</span></div>
<div><span style="font-family:Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif;font-size:12px;line-height:16.799999237060547px;background-color:rgb(255, 255, 255)">Thanks, all the best.</span></div>
<div><span style="font-family:Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif;font-size:12px;line-height:16.799999237060547px;background-color:rgb(255, 255, 255)">Clement</span></div>]]></description><link>https://community.troikatronix.com/post/13101</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.troikatronix.com/post/13101</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Clement]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2014 10:32:57 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Did someone try the Blackmagic UltraStudio 4K ? on Sun, 12 Oct 2014 13:24:50 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Hi Clement,</p>
<div>I would not use BM cards for output.</div>
<div>With a graphic card, you have the hardware for opengl etc...</div>
<div>On the output of a BM video card not.</div>
<div>If you need 4k output on SDI of a computer, I would use HDMI output of a graphic card and then convert it ( for ~220€ ) to SDI.</div>
<div>Then, BM cards for capture are nice, and I personnaly allways had good experiences with Isadora ant it.</div>
<div>Best</div>
<div>Mehdi</div>]]></description><link>https://community.troikatronix.com/post/13093</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.troikatronix.com/post/13093</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[keftaparty]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2014 13:24:50 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>