<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Multiple outputs to CRT TVs]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Hi internet!</p>
<div>I've got an install project brewing that involves a whole bunch of old school CRT TVs in an array behind a music stage.  I'm hoping to have as finite control over them as possible through Izzy.  This means that I'm looking to use all 6 stage outputs, but I only need each one to be 640x480\.  I'm trying to figure out the best combo of hardware for this setup.  Now I could just build a big desktop with 6 cheap little video cards in it, output VGA and then get 6 VGA to composite video adapters to get down to the TV's level.  BUT, that sounds like a big pile of mess with a lot of possible points of failure.  What I'd ideally like is some sort of specialized video card with 6 composite video outputs via BNC jacks on the back of it.  I'm thinking something like that must exist somewhere.  Perhaps in the security camera industry?</div>
<div>However, I have had no luck finding one.  Anyone seen a card like this?  Or have other thoughts on how to attack this?</div>
<div>Thanks in advance!</div>]]></description><link>https://community.troikatronix.com/topic/2794/multiple-outputs-to-crt-tvs</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 12:45:59 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://community.troikatronix.com/topic/2794.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2016 20:47:06 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Multiple outputs to CRT TVs on Sun, 18 Jan 1970 00:41:35 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">I would likely use two Matrox Triple heads to go.</p>
<div>each can easily handle 3x 640x480 outputs.</div>
<div>You could probably even use a Matrox Dual head to go, with 2 triple heads attached if you only have one Display port out. The total resolution you are after is pretty low, so this shouldn't be to much of a strain.</div>
<div>You are looking at 3840 width (640x6), and assuming mini display port, can handle this if running version 1.2</div>
<div>"<span style="color:rgb(37, 37, 37);font-family:sans-serif;font-size:14px;line-height:22.4px;background-color:rgb(255, 255, 255)"> the Mini DisplayPort can drive display devices with resolutions up to 2560×1600 (</span>[WQXGA](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WQXGA#WQXGA_.281600p.29 "WQXGA")<span style="color:rgb(37, 37, 37);font-family:sans-serif;font-size:14px;line-height:22.4px;background-color:rgb(255, 255, 255)">) in its DisplayPort 1.1a implementation, and 4096x2160 (</span>[4K](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/4K_resolution "4K resolution")<span style="color:rgb(37, 37, 37);font-family:sans-serif;font-size:14px;line-height:22.4px;background-color:rgb(255, 255, 255)">) in its DisplayPort 1.2 implementation. </span><span style="font-size:10pt">"</span></div>
<div><span style="font-size:10pt">  
</span></div>]]></description><link>https://community.troikatronix.com/post/20799</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.troikatronix.com/post/20799</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[DusX]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 1970 00:41:35 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>