<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[&quot;Movie player direct &quot; vs. &quot;movie player&quot; performance]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Hi out there<br />
sorry for a perhaps silly question:</p>
<p dir="auto">when trying to setup a sipmle movie-scratching-patch (i.e. mouse watcher to postition, speed:0) the  "Movie Player" won't react properly<br />
(the movie is 1024 x768 photo jpeg) whereas the "Movie Player Direct" does it acurate .... why?</p>
<p dir="auto">I'm really at a loss with it....<br />
as I/d like to fade between two films I'm trapped ...</p>
<p dir="auto">gracefull for every hint</p>
<p dir="auto">mickey</p>
<p dir="auto">1.3.0f24</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.troikatronix.com/topic/383/movie-player-direct-vs-movie-player-performance</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2026 14:44:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://community.troikatronix.com/topic/383.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 10:16:58 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to &quot;Movie player direct &quot; vs. &quot;movie player&quot; performance on Tue, 18 Dec 2012 11:52:13 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">to anybody who ecounters the same phenomenon:</p>
<p dir="auto">setting the movie speed to the lowest level (i.e. 0,1 or 0,01) will make the movie scratchable in both directions.</p>
<p dir="auto">mickey</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.troikatronix.com/post/5432</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.troikatronix.com/post/5432</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[mickey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 11:52:13 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to &quot;Movie player direct &quot; vs. &quot;movie player&quot; performance on Tue, 11 Dec 2012 00:42:22 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">dear mark<br />
(early bird)</p>
<p dir="auto">the codec is PHOTO JPEG, the size is ca 10MB , the machine is mac ...</p>
<p dir="auto">the trouble starts with the first "backward" move:<br />
seems I can cheat that with the MoviePlayer speed set to 0,01 ...</p>
<p dir="auto">its really a mimimal patch:<br />
some tweeking of incomming midi from nI mate,<br />
a short fade bteween 2 films...projecting . need just to scratch the position of120 frames film</p>
<p dir="auto">the machine, that should perform..(for just one day ,-) )is:<br />
imac intel  core2duo / 2,16 4GB/ no core</p>
<p dir="auto">but i have the same trouble on my "uptodate" machine<br />
(imac i7 3,1 16GB)</p>
<p dir="auto">greets<br />
mickey</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.troikatronix.com/post/5333</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.troikatronix.com/post/5333</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[mickey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 00:42:22 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to &quot;Movie player direct &quot; vs. &quot;movie player&quot; performance on Mon, 10 Dec 2012 19:31:03 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Dear Mickey,</p>
<div>What is the codec you are using for the clip? Photo JPEG? H264? And are you on Mac or PC?</div>
<div>The Movie Player direct bypasses everything in Isadora, to render the movie directly to the stage. You'll notice, for instance, when using it, you can no longer do any fades. So it is efficient in a certain way, but you also lose some functionality when you use it.</div>
<div>
<div>Best Wishes,</div>
<div>Mark</div>
</div>]]></description><link>https://community.troikatronix.com/post/5329</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.troikatronix.com/post/5329</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[mark]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 19:31:03 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>