<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[[ANSWERED] - HAP vs HAP Q]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Hello,</p>
<p>I would like to know id there is a visible difference between HAP and HAP Q when using it on 1920 x 1080 projections.</p>
<p>Thx,</p>]]></description><link>https://community.troikatronix.com/topic/5583/answered-hap-vs-hap-q</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2026 15:43:09 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://community.troikatronix.com/topic/5583.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2018 22:26:47 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to [ANSWERED] - HAP vs HAP Q on Wed, 31 Oct 2018 14:51:51 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Dear DusX,</p><p></p><p>Thanks!</p><p></p><p>mrtz</p>]]></description><link>https://community.troikatronix.com/post/32803</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.troikatronix.com/post/32803</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[mrtz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2018 14:51:51 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to [ANSWERED] - HAP vs HAP Q on Mon, 29 Oct 2018 22:42:42 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="https://community.troikatronix.com/uid/2427">@mrtz</a></p><p>Yes, there can be a difference, probably most noticeable in smooth gradients. <br />I suggest compressing a sample of your footage to both and comparing. Keep in mind that the projectors and surface may also play a role.</p>]]></description><link>https://community.troikatronix.com/post/32763</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.troikatronix.com/post/32763</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[DusX]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2018 22:42:42 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>