I did another test to see if Vision caused the load. Same result with NDI monitor. solid 96% 

To be honest I feel like my trashcan is getting tired. Lots of this behaviour across the board. I hope I just need a fresh sys install and that apple isn't phasing the 6,1 out.

thanks a lot for the explanation. It is a great help to understand how it works and how we can better work with.

best, Jean-François

I am a bit surprised by 96% usage. Here is what I got rendering 1920x1080 to NDI on the same machine:

(Machine Specs: MacOS Mojave 10.14.6, latest NDI tools, 2.2 GHz Intel Core i7)

Look at the CPU usage for Isadora and the NewTek NDI Video Monitor

As you can see, the receiver is also using a significant amount of CPU.

But @DusX is right: NDI requires is heavy. When sending NDI, the following things happen under the hood:

• Isadora must pull the stage image from the GPU to get it back on the CPU. This is never optimal because GPUs are optimized to receive data for rendering, not to give it back.) Because this process slows down the rendering cycle, you see the LOAD in Isadora go up significantly.
• This image is passed to the NDI system, which performs whatever compression is necessary to send the data over the network. This is also not optimal because the image is ARGB instead of YUV or some more efficient codec. (It has to be that way because the GPU image comes back as ARGB... you can't get it back as YUV, etc.)
• NDI then sends the data over the network, which has its own overhead.

When I sent the signal to a second computer (while maintaining the connection on the local computer), the load in Isadora did not rise significantly. 

Again, as @DusX said, Syphon/Spout avoid the pitfalls listed above. They use "texture sharing" which means the GPU image never leaves the GPU. That is why Syphon/Spout show nearly zero overhead and nearly zero latency.

One solution that might improve performance is to go through NDI Syphon. Because this app uses Syphon as an input and because it is in a completely separate application space, it does not slow down Isadora's rendering cycle as much. For sure the LOAD on Isadora is going to be less because it does not have to interrupt its rendering cycle to get the image back from the GPU.

I hope that these details shed some light on the process and why NDI is necessarily heavy.

Best Wishes,
Mark

— isadora 3.08b USB — osx catalina — trashcan 6 core — d500 — 32gb — load 96%

—  Isadora 3.0.7 Demo — windows 10 — Ryzen 5 2600X — 2070 S — load 25%

In Vision I have the option of high or low bandwidth NDI and I chose low on both systems.

I find it interesting how NDI ramps up when subscribed to and that it's more or less dormant otherwise (2% incl movie playing). Makes sense I guess.

Just testing for now and I will probably go isadora out of one box and via video capture into a Vectorworks Vision box in the end.

I've also found the load to be quite high, although not 75 - 95%! Having said that, I am using 2 NDI 720p feeds in the same scene with stability and getting loads of about 70%.

@fubbi , you don't mention your equipment or OS.

@mark, @dusx, any tips for  optimizing NDI (for me, on Windows)?

Cheers,

Hugh

Video ProRes 1920x1080 sent from Isadora to Newtek NDI Video Monitor give me a load of 50%.

The same file with syphon is by 1,2%

best, Jean-François 

What kind of resolution are you sending?