• Products
    • Isadora
    • Get It
    • ADD-ONS
    • IzzyCast
    • Get It
  • Forum
  • Help
  • Werkstatt
  • Newsletter
  • Impressum
  • Dsgvo
  • Press
  • Isadora
  • Get It
  • ADD-ONS
  • IzzyCast
  • Get It
  • Press
  • Dsgvo
  • Impressum

Navigation

    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Popular
    • Tags

    Which actors need most power

    Troubleshooting and Bug Reports
    3
    6
    1632
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • N
      niknaim last edited by

      Hello,
      is there any guide that shows how much CPU the which actors needs. Or which actors needs more or less CPU? I come finally to an end with my computerspeed and would like to know what kind of actors or which kind of use of actors makes my framerate to go down. Of course I can try to delete all the actors one after another, to see when my framerate goes up again. But my project became very large and maybe some kind of description exists already. I am talking about the basic actors and not the 3D-actors which I dont use at all.

      Thanks,
      Niklas

      Win 8 64, i7, 8gb, nVidia GT 640M

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • DusX
        DusX Tech Staff last edited by

        Hi Niklas.
        There is no per actor meter that will show cpu unit used. You have the Performance Monitor, that will show your scenes framerate and cpu cycles.
        As far as what uses the most CPU, there are a couple things to remember:

        • generally doing calculations is not a strain on the system. Even the Smoother actor which runs many quick calculations will not be a huge strain.
        • Video processing is the big one (FreeFrame effects, and analysis)
        • Video Scaling is a big one (this can be tricky since scaling may occur differently depending on your preferences)

        A good rule of that I follow is to ensure that at any point the video resolution is as small possible for the next process.
        You can accomplish this a number of ways.. The scaler actor... mixing with another stream (or re-sizeable background actor) etc... but remember scaling also eats CPU so sometimes its a balance between scaling and the effects you are running.

        I hope that helps.

        Troikatronix Technical Support

        • New Support Ticket Link: https://support.troikatronix.com/support/tickets/new
        • My Add-ons: https://troikatronix.com/add-ons/?u=dusx
        • Profession Services: https://support.troikatronix.com/support/solutions/articles/13000109444-professional-services

        Running: Win 11 64bit, i7, M.2 PCIe SSD's, 32gb DDR4, nVidia GTX 4070 | located in Ontario Canada.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • N
          niknaim last edited by

          Hi DusX,
          thanks! That information was what I was asking for. Scaling should be an issue in my project because I use as footage only MOVs with dv-codec (768x576) in 100% size. The thing I am not sure about is, if that is sclaed to 16:9 (set up in the preferences)...does that count as scaling too?

          And there is one special effect I use. To double my image and place the the two versio on top of each other I used the multivid actor with 1 column and two rows and scaled the outcoming video with the zoomer actor vertically two 200%. Is there another way of doubling my video image?

          Thanks again for your really quick answer,
          Niklas

          Win 8 64, i7, 8gb, nVidia GT 640M

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • dbini
            dbini last edited by

            i think zoomer is bit of a CPU killer. could you achieve the same effect with 2 projectors?

            if you compress your MOVs into photo JPEG at about 80% compression then 768x576 should run pretty smoothly - depending on your system.
            to check if its a specific actor that's eating your CPU then use the Performance Monitor and click on the bypass of each actor in turn instead of deleting it. a bypassed actor does not use any resources.

            John Collingswood
            taikabox.com
            2019 MBPT 2.6GHZ i7 OSX15.3.2 16GB
            plus an old iMac and assorted Mac Minis for installations

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • N
              niknaim last edited by

              Hi dbni,
              i thought that the zoomer need a lot CPU. I had it befor exactly as you said, with two projectors, but my impression was, that this cost meed even more. I will try to go back and compare the two version.

              Niklas

              Win 8 64, i7, 8gb, nVidia GT 640M

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • DusX
                DusX Tech Staff last edited by

                Scaling via the Projector should offset this processing to the GPU rather than CPU.
                Likewise any stage settings that scale should be handled by the GPU.
                Its always finding the right balance for a specific machine. If you have a strong GPU its good to try to move a lot of the work over to it.

                Troikatronix Technical Support

                • New Support Ticket Link: https://support.troikatronix.com/support/tickets/new
                • My Add-ons: https://troikatronix.com/add-ons/?u=dusx
                • Profession Services: https://support.troikatronix.com/support/solutions/articles/13000109444-professional-services

                Running: Win 11 64bit, i7, M.2 PCIe SSD's, 32gb DDR4, nVidia GTX 4070 | located in Ontario Canada.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • First post
                  Last post