• Products
    • Isadora
    • Get It
    • ADD-ONS
    • IzzyCast
    • Get It
  • Forum
  • Help
  • Werkstatt
  • Newsletter
  • Impressum
  • Dsgvo
  • Press
  • Isadora
  • Get It
  • ADD-ONS
  • IzzyCast
  • Get It
  • Press
  • Dsgvo
  • Impressum

Navigation

    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Popular
    • Tags

    NDI output, full or hx? And what about vs 3 or 4?

    How To... ?
    3
    7
    1122
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • plem
      plem last edited by

      I want to start using the Stage NDI output. But at the end of the road I’ll have to go back to HDMI (for my beamers). So I need a NDI > HDMI decoder. But what about the different types of NDI. Is Isadora sending NDIfull or NDIhx? And do I have to take in account that it could be different versions of NDI (3 or 4).

      (You probably notice that I try to keep up with the NDI happening, but still lack a lot of insight)

      Thanks

      Peter

      OSX 10.15.7, MacBook pro, 2,6 GHz Intel Core i7, Radeon Pro 560X 4 GB
      Intel UHD Graphics 630 1536 MB

      Michel 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • Michel
        Michel Izzy Guru @plem last edited by

        @plem

        I am not sure what you want to do. You want to go out of your computer with NDI and then convert it to HDMI just before the beamer? I don't think this makes a lot of sense, especially because NDI is quite hard on your CPU. If you want to avoid long HDMI cables you would rather use HDBaseT converters or HDMI-SDI and back.

        Best Michel

        Michel Weber | www.filmprojekt.ch | rMBP (2019) i9, 16gig, AMD 5500M 8 GB, OS X 10.15 | located in Winterthur Switzerland.

        plem 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • plem
          plem @Michel last edited by

          @Michel

          Hai Michel,

          That, indeed, was my intention. Thinking that working with NDI was more general (and future proof, and maybe even cheaper) then specific solutions that send HDMI over a cat-cable. I was even hoping a little bit, that I could send a lower res-image (1280x720) over a dedicated router. But maybe that was to optimistic? And cpu-wise? Would that really be to much burden for a MacBook Pro 2019, giving the fact that the patch now uses an average of 30% cpu?  Do you have any experience on things like this? Any recommendations?

          OSX 10.15.7, MacBook pro, 2,6 GHz Intel Core i7, Radeon Pro 560X 4 GB
          Intel UHD Graphics 630 1536 MB

          Michel Fred 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • Michel
            Michel Izzy Guru @plem last edited by Michel

            @plem

            Here is an post from @Mark about how NDI is working: https://community.troikatronix...

            A HDBaseT extender set costs around $500.-: https://www.purelink.de/en/sig...

            Birddog planned to ship a NDI to HDMI converter in September for $400.-, but it seems it did not ship yet: https://bird-dog.tv/flex-overv...

            As @Mark has written NDI has the downside of pulling from the GPU to the CPU and 1 signal may work fine but if you sending to 3 different projectors or more this can be unusable depending on your computer specs. I don't have a tried any NDI to HDMI converter yet and can not say how workable it is.

            Best Michel

            Michel Weber | www.filmprojekt.ch | rMBP (2019) i9, 16gig, AMD 5500M 8 GB, OS X 10.15 | located in Winterthur Switzerland.

            plem 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • Fred
              Fred @plem last edited by Michel

              @plem just to add that if it is only extension and 1280*720 is OK, I would go with SDI, the blackmagic micro convertors are €45 each way, and a lossless conversion to SDI and back. SDI cables (paricularly those capable of 720p) as cheap and easy to repair on site if need be. I would definitely use a hardware conversion for signal extension, things like getting an EDID handshake and not doing any frame rate or size conversion will be more transparent than if you use NDI. You can also flood your network and overwhelm a mid range router or switch with enough NDI.

              There are also a lot of cheaper HDbaset options you can look for as well. Michel linked to a good system though.


              Magewell do have an NDI to HDMI out now - Magewell Pro Convert for NDI® to HDMI.

              Fred

              http://www.fredrodrigues.net/
              https://github.com/fred-dev
              OSX 13.6.4 (22G513) MBP 2019 16" 2.3 GHz 8-Core i9, Radeon Pro 5500M 8 GB, 32g RAM
              Windows 10 7700K, GTX 1080ti, 32g RAM, 2tb raided SSD

              plem 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • plem
                plem @Fred last edited by

                @Fred

                Just curious. What cables do you use for SDI? The standard, old fashioned, 75ohm coax cables? They will last for 50 meters extension?

                OSX 10.15.7, MacBook pro, 2,6 GHz Intel Core i7, Radeon Pro 560X 4 GB
                Intel UHD Graphics 630 1536 MB

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • plem
                  plem @Michel last edited by

                  @Michel

                  The pictures start to get clearer. And, as always, the remarks of Mark shed a lot of light.

                  Thanks for your answers.

                  OSX 10.15.7, MacBook pro, 2,6 GHz Intel Core i7, Radeon Pro 560X 4 GB
                  Intel UHD Graphics 630 1536 MB

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • First post
                    Last post