• Products
    • Isadora
    • Get It
    • ADD-ONS
    • IzzyCast
    • Get It
  • Forum
  • Help
  • Werkstatt
  • Newsletter
  • Impressum
  • Dsgvo
  • Press
  • Isadora
  • Get It
  • ADD-ONS
  • IzzyCast
  • Get It
  • Press
  • Dsgvo
  • Impressum

Navigation

    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Popular
    • Tags

    ​Multiple live feeds on thunderbolt 3/USB C

    Hardware
    3
    4
    1370
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • M
      Mr__Jules last edited by

      Hi, 

      I'm looking at connecting 3-4 identical cameras (HDMI) simultaneously to a 2018 maxed-out 13 in MacBook Pro. 

      All solutions considered, either multiple boxes or an all-in-one. 

      Thanks for your advice

      Woland Fred 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • Woland
        Woland Tech Staff @Mr__Jules last edited by

        @mr__jules

        I'd try to use hardware to combine the feeds into one input (security camera style) and then use Chopper actor to get the quadrant that you want.

        TroikaTronix Technical Support
        New Support Ticket: https://support.troikatronix.com/support/tickets/new
        Support Policy: https://support.troikatronix.com/support/solutions/articles/13000064762
        Add-Ons: https://troikatronix.com/add-ons/ & https://troikatronix.com/add-ons/?u=woland
        Professional Services: https://support.troikatronix.com/support/solutions/articles/13000109444

        | Isadora Version: all of them | Mac Pro (Late 2013), macOS 10.14.6, 3.5GHz 6-core, 1TB SSD, 64GB RAM, Dual AMD FirePro D700s |

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • Fred
          Fred @Mr__Jules last edited by

          @mr__jules

          You have a few options, the quad split is a good idea, but requires all cameras to have the same resolution and frame-rate, also as these cameras need to be frame sync there will be extra delay while the quad splitter (multi-view) does this. It also means that with more than one camera you are limited to 960*540 per input.

          Most likely, to get any reliable cable length you will want to convert to SDI anyway, HDMI over 5 m can work, but the cables are expensive and cannot be repaired and generally unreliable enough that you don't want them in a show.

          You can also go for an external pcie enclosure and put a quad capture card in it. I use a blackmagic decklink duo 2 (https://www.blackmagicdesign.c...) it gives up to 4 inputs or outputs (configured in pairs). There are also some external pcie boxes with multiple pcie slots..

          Beware of cheap quad splitters, a lot of them will not actually give proper refresh rates on the output and although they can be viewed on a screen they cannot be captured. There are quite a few when you search HDMI multiview, but if you use one make sure you can test and send it back.

          Either way you are looking at investing some money-

          DeckLink Duo 2 - €435

          4x HDMI to SDI convertors - €130

          OWC Mercury Helios Thunderbolt 3 PCIe Expansion Chassis €250

          But a single capture box (especially one that can do 50/60hz) and a quad splitter will come close (I will stick to 3g capable gear)

          UltraStudio HD Mini €435

          Blackmagic Design MultiView 4 Hd €185

          4x HDMI to SDI convertors - €130

          Not much between the 2 options and the multi-view setup (although smaller) is going to give more delay and be a lot less flexible (as well as limiting your resolution to 960*540 per camera.

          http://www.fredrodrigues.net/
          https://github.com/fred-dev
          OSX 13.6.4 (22G513) MBP 2019 16" 2.3 GHz 8-Core i9, Radeon Pro 5500M 8 GB, 32g RAM
          Windows 10 7700K, GTX 1080ti, 32g RAM, 2tb raided SSD

          M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
          • M
            Mr__Jules @Fred last edited by

            @fred Many thanks. Most useful

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • First post
              Last post